Cutting Rank: Domain Name Redirect Can Forfeit Your Top Rankings

November 9th, 2009 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Can my site rank better with a keyword-rich domain name? Sure.

Can my site rank better without a keyword in the domain name at all? Absolutely.

I get questions (or assumptions) like this regularly. Actually, there are many other things going on behind the scenes that impact rank, and the domain name is rarely a significant factor.

Let’s say your website has been out there for 6 months or more and you assume, for whatever reason, that you can get a higher search engine ranking if you were using a keyword in your domain name instead of the one you have. In addition to your company web domain, maindomain.com, you rush to purchase keyword1.comkeyword2.com and keyword3.com.

From Google’s perspective, there is both a good way and a detrimental way to assign these additional domain names to your site. This can cause a much greater problem in terms of organic ranking if you get it wrong in terms of duplicate content and trust. Have you ever heard of duplicate content? Which domain name does Google have more history and trust with, your current domain name or one you just bought?

Common methods webmasters use to point multiple domain names to your web server include:

• Domain Mirroring/Masking

• Domain Cloaking

• Domain Alias/URL Alias

• Domain Redirecting

Domain mirroring/masking is sometimes called a pointer domain. It looks like it is the domain name when it is used in a browser, but it is simply a mask overlaying the real domain name and its content. When someone types in www.domain.com, it’s really forwarding todomain.blogspot.com without the address changing in the address bar. The user continues to seewww.domain.com in the address bar, although the site and its contents are really from domain.blogspot.com.

Domain cloaking uses an iframe or embedded frameset to display the content of another site.

Domain redirecting (also called URL redirecting) requires all traffic that is sent through the new domain name to be redirected to the main domain name. This can also be a domain redirected to a subdirectory of the main domain, or multiple domains redirected to a complex URL. This is different from domain mirroring/masking and domain cloaking because, when a user types in www.domain.com, they end up on www.maindomain.com and the address changes appropriately in the address bar.

But, let’s back up a second and look at the issues you must consider before making this decision.

1. To limit confusion, it’s better to change the brand (or company) name to better reflect the keyword-rich domain name. This could be as simple as recreating the company logo, but you might consult your customer base first.

2. The technical procedure of redirecting domain names must be done so that the search engines do not get confused about what you are trying to do. Otherwise, you risk tripping a duplicate content filter, which would force Google to accept only one domain with that content (explained below). But the biggest risk is setting off an alarm at Google that you are trying to trick them to get a better rank.

Just for fun, let’s say you’ve gone through the trouble of changing the company name to reflect your new keyword-rich domain. Now it’s time to get technical.

If you use any method other than domain redirecting, you are going to be disappointed with your search rank. Domain mirroring, masking, cloaking and aliases confuse search engines because they see the same content under a different domain name. Google then selects one of the domain names to display that content and leaves the others out of the search results. Google chooses for you – since you are not aware of how to manage your duplicate content issues – and no one knows which domain name Google will choose. You could be saying “bye-bye” to all the hard-earned link juice pointed at your main domain name.

The more serious issue with domain mirroring/masking is the probability that Google suspects you are trying to manipulate search rank by suddenly using keywords in additional domain names. The result is either loss of whatever good ranking you did have or your site is banned from Google altogether. Ouch!

This is precisely what happened with a client. Despite my warnings, but thinking they might change the company name eventually, they bought additional keyword-rich domain names and had the webmaster point them at their server (using domain masking). Within a couple weeks Google dropped their domain ranking across the board, but did not ban them.

Of course they came to me with their issue. I gently reminded them about how this should have been done, redirected the domain names properly (using a 301 redirect) and asked them to consult me next time they’re considering a marketing or technical decision regarding the website. It took about 6 weeks – a long and painful 6 weeks – for Google to restore their good rank again.

When a company acquires additional domain names, they should be permanently redirected to the main domain name – the one, central location on the web for all of the company’s or brand’s content.

Redirecting a domain name should be handled differently depending on the type of server hosting your site (Apache or Windows), how much control you have over that server (hosted on a shared or dedicated server) and the purpose of the redirected domain name.

By: Tom Shivers

Categories: SEO Tags:
  1. December 15th, 2010 at 19:57 | #1

    Hi! Your article rocks and is really a very good understand!…

  2. December 13th, 2010 at 03:23 | #2

    nice post. thanks.

  3. December 12th, 2010 at 22:54 | #3

    Today I read on this question much.

  4. December 10th, 2010 at 11:18 | #4

    Thanks for the help in this question.

  5. December 10th, 2010 at 11:13 | #5

    I confirm. And I have faced it. Let’s discuss this question.

  6. December 10th, 2010 at 09:27 | #6

    excellent daybook you obtain

  7. December 10th, 2010 at 01:47 | #7

    I can look for the reference to a site with the information on a theme interesting you.

  8. December 9th, 2010 at 20:02 | #8

    hi thanks for the infomation.

  9. December 9th, 2010 at 15:37 | #9

    I am sorry, that has interfered… I understand this question. It is possible to discuss. Write here or in PM.

  10. December 8th, 2010 at 18:58 | #10

    In my opinion it is obvious. Try to look for the answer to your question in google.com

  11. December 8th, 2010 at 15:22 | #11

    I be enduring be familiar with a scarcely any of the articles on your website now, and I definitely like your line of blogging. I added it to my favorites trap stage list and will be checking stand behind soon. Please contain in view my position as ok and vindicate me be familiar with what you think. Thanks.

  12. December 8th, 2010 at 12:43 | #12

    Completely I share your opinion. Idea excellent, I support.

  13. December 8th, 2010 at 01:21 | #13

    Keep posting stuff like this i really like it

  14. December 2nd, 2010 at 07:09 | #14

    hi!This was a really magnificentsuper post!
    I come from roma, I was luck to seek your blog in yahoo
    Also I get much in your blog really thanks very much i will come daily

  15. Anonymous
    April 24th, 2010 at 16:14 | #15

    Hello

    thanks for this tips.

  16. March 6th, 2010 at 18:53 | #16

    After reading you site, Your site is very useful for me .I bookmarked your site!My Home free battery

  17. March 2nd, 2010 at 00:16 | #17

    After reading you site, Your site is very useful for me .I bookmarked your site!
    I am been engaged 10 years on the Free finance personal software If you have some questions, please get in touch with me.

  18. February 27th, 2010 at 14:39 | #18

    After reading you site, Your site is very useful for me .I bookmarked your site!

  19. Bert Hughes
    February 21st, 2010 at 18:43 | #19

    Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
    And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time! :)

  20. February 20th, 2010 at 11:32 | #20

    Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now. Keep it up!
    And according to this article, I totally agree with your opinion, but only this time! :)

  21. Billie Butler
    February 19th, 2010 at 13:31 | #21

    I really like when people are expressing their opinion and thought. So I like the way you are writing

  22. discount amazon
    February 16th, 2010 at 04:44 | #22

    nice read. I would love to follow you on twitter.

  23. jon1ala234l
    February 15th, 2010 at 12:35 | #23

    Nice post and this post helped me a lot in my college assignments. Thanks you for your information.

  24. ilka
    February 13th, 2010 at 08:59 | #24

    случайно попал на этот блог, честно скаже что понравился очень, буду постоянным посетителем.

  25. credit cash advance
    February 12th, 2010 at 03:51 | #25

    I am completely impressed with the article I have just read. I wish the author of http://www.scriptgiantacademy.com can continue to provide so much practical information and unforgettable experience to http://www.scriptgiantacademy.com readers. There is not much to state except the following universal truth: You’ve never quite sure whether it’s ok to eat green crisps. I will be back.

  26. Bernice Franklin
    February 10th, 2010 at 12:41 | #26

    I found this article useful in a paper I am writing at university. Hopefully, I get an A+ now!

    Thanks

    Bernice Franklin

  27. ray ban store
    February 6th, 2010 at 01:55 | #27

    I enjoyed the article and thanks in consideration of posting such valuable tidings to go to all of us to skim, I set up up it both valuable and resourceful and I delineate to salute it as on the other side of as I can.

  28. MrBarns
    February 2nd, 2010 at 13:08 | #28

    Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again – taking your feeds too now, Thanks.

  29. Anonymous
    January 21st, 2010 at 16:36 | #29

    Opulently I acquiesce in but I dream the post should prepare more info then it has.

  30. jhon lamad
    December 31st, 2009 at 06:59 | #30

    Super-Duper site! I am loving it!! Will come back again – taking you feeds also, Thanks.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

What is 5 + 7 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is: